Madhavan v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Counsel requested withdrawal of the petition, which was endorsed and accepted by the Court, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Ninth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.23813 of 2021
MADHAVAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEPPAMKUPPAM POLICE STATION, VEPPAMKUPPAM, VELLORE DISTRICT. (CR.NO.181 OF 2021)
For Petitioner : M/S.B.S.RAMESH Advocate
For Respondent : MR.S.BALAJI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Madhavan
- respondent
State by the Inspector of Police, Veppamkuppam Police Station
Coram
M. Dhandapani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court