Sekar v. Sivabalu
Case brief
What is this about?
Note: This text is a preliminary list-order involving a Cheque Dishonour matter. The court directed registry to number and list the appeal for admission.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to number the appeal and list the same for admission.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. O.P.No. 23658 of 2021 in Crl.A.SR.44331 of 2021
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.
The learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant would submit that excepting a bare denial that the cheque book was lost, no other evidence has been let in by the accused. The Trial Court rightly finding that no evidence has been let in by the accused in defence, had convicted him whereas the Appellate Court on erroneous grounds, had set aside the order of conviction.
2. Leave is granted
13.12.2021
vri/shk
Note:
Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court