Petitioner sought quashing of proceedings regarding two criminal cases. The Court intervened after hearing counsel, clubbing the present submissions with the fact that both underlying cases had already resulted in acquittal, rendering the petitions infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.07.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.Nos.23526 and 23527 of 2018
Govindasamy ... Petitioner in both Crl.O.Ps.
Vs.
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Krishnapuram, Dharmapuri District.
... Respondent in both Crl.O.Ps.
Common Prayer:
Petitions filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking to direct the Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Dharmapuri to speedy disposal of the above cases in C.C.Nos.148 and 85 of 2017 respectively, time frame may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that during the pendancy of these petitions, the cases ended in acquittal and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in these petitions.
2.In view of the above, these criminal original petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pri
To 1. The Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Dharmapuri. 2. The Inspector of Police, Krishnapuram, Dharmapuri District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. +1cc to Mr.M.Mariappan, Advocate, S.R.No.31277 Crl.O.P.Nos.23526 and 23527 of 2018 UM(CO) RLP(30/07/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Govindasamy
State Rep. by Inspector of Police, Krishnapuram, Dharmapuri District
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
