Disposed

P.Chakravarthy v. the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Madras HC17 Nov 2021CRL OP/21457/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought court intervention against alleged police harassment stemming from a civil dispute. The court noted the petitioner admitted receiving a notice but failing to respond and submitted documents. The court directed the petitioner to appear with relevant documents and remanded the matter to the police.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to appear before respondent police on 01.12.2021 with relevant documents.

P.Chakravarthy Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 17.11.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.21457 of 2021

¶6

P.Chakravarthy ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell Thiruvallur.

¶9

2.The Inspector of Police Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell Thiruvallur. ... Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Baskar

¶12

For Respondents: Mr.A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This petition has been filed to to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner.

¶15

A civil dispute is pending between the petitioner and one Venkatachalapathy. The said Venkatachalapathy made a complaint and the second respondent Police called the petitioner for enquiry. Hence, the petitioner has filed this petition.

¶16

The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the said Venkatachalapathy lodged a complaint in C.No.263/DSP/ALGCC/2021 dated 07.08.2021 and hence, the petitioner was called for enquiry through a notice dated 22.09.2021. The petitioner after receiving the notice issued by the Police, failed to respond to the same. On the other hand terming it as harassment, has filed this petition.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ that he sent a reply on 29.09.2021 stating that there is a

¶18

civil suit pending between them in OS.Nos.75 and 116 of 2021 before the District Magistrate Court, Thiruvallur. He further submitted that prior to it, he had submitted a copy of the plaint and other documents in support of his contention.

¶19

At this stage, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that no such documents have been received.

¶20

In view of the same, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent Police on 01.12.2021 along with relevant documents and the respondent police shall proceed in accordance with law.

¶21

With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)

¶24

//True copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

dna/rgi

¶27

¶28

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell Thiruvallur.

¶29

2.The Inspector of Police Anti-Land Grabbing Special Cell Thiruvallur.

¶30

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶31

+2ccs to Mr.S.Baskar, Advocate SR.No.59354

¶32

CRL.O.P.No.21457 of 2021

¶33

PMK(CO) GMY(07/12/2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Chakravarthy v. the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Chakravarthy v. the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Juliyanrayar Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Surya Narayanan Vs the Inspector of Police

Gunavathi Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Jayavel Vs the District Superintendent of Police

R.Vinitha Vs State Rep by

V.Ramya Vs the Superintendent of Police