Jagan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as the petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of November Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.21415 of 2021
1 JAGAN 2 SEKAR @ VENKATESAN
[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
3 KRISHNAMOORTHY
Vs
1 STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANIYAMBODI TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUPPATHUR DISTRICT VELLORE DISTRICT. CRIME NO.590/2021
For Petitioner : MR.M.MACHAVATHARAN FOR M/S.E.KANNADASAN Advocate
For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the withdrawal of an anticipatory bail petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JAGAN 2 SEKAR @ VENKATESAN KRISHNAMOORTHY
- respondent
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
Coram
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court