Nagaraj v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed an anticipatory bail petition since the Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation in Reference No. 381 of 2020 was closed. Consequently, this Criminal Original Petition was closed without granting relief.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.21022 of 2020
1 NAGARAJ [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 MARIYAMMAL
Vs
STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, LAND GRABBING CELL, THIRUVANNAMALAI.
CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2020.
For Petitioner : M/S.V.R.APPASWAMEE Advocate
For Respondent : MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail petition should be dismissed as the underlying inquiry has been closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NAGARAJ
- petitioner
MARIYAMMAL
- respondent
STATE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court