Gunasekaran v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
A single judge corrected a clerical error in a prior anticipatory bail order regarding the bail amount to be deposited, directing the registry to issue a fresh copy.
What did the court decide?
Error in earlier bail order corrected; registry directed to issue fresh order.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.20966 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 18.01.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN
Crl.O.P.No.20966 of 2020
1.Gunasekaran
2.Mani
3.Manoharan
4.Lokesh
5.Anbusekar
6.Sarathkumar
7.Murugesan
8.Dilli
9.Rani @ Raniammal
10.Uthirakumari
...Petitioners
Vs.
The State rep.by
The Sub-Inspector of Police,
Gudiyatham Taluk Police Station,
Gudiyatham, Vellore District.
Crime No. 759 of 2020
... Respondent
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.759 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police.
1/4
Crl.O.P.No.20966 of 2020
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gunasekaran
- respondent
State
Coram
V. BHARATHIDASAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court