The petitioner, already arrested, filed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court recorded that the petitioner was arrested on 14.06.2021 and closed the citation without granting relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of June Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.20679 of 2020
RAFI @ NOORUDEEN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-3 PUZHAL POLICE STATION, CR.NO.2838/2020.
For Petitioner : M/S.V.BHAGYARAJ Advocate
For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATEEP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 418, 420 of IPC, in Crime No.2838 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.
-sd/-
16/06/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-3 PUZHAL POLICE STATION, CHENNAI
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
CRL OP.20679/2020
Date :16/06/2021
RVR 29/06/2021
RAFI @ NOORUDEEN
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, M-3 PUZHAL POLICE STATION
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
