Pandiyan v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged his arrest under the NDPS Act for possession of 24 kgs of ganja, arguing his individual share was not commercial. The court held the quantity was commercial and denied bail.
What did the court decide?
The petition for bail is dismissed; the petitioner remains in judicial custody.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19985 of 2021
PANDIYAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.1497 OF 2020)
For Petitioner : M/S.K.JOTHISIVAM Advocate
For Respondent : MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with possessing a commercial quantity of ganja.
Whether the 12 kgs of ganja alleged to be seized from the petitioner constitutes a commercial quantity.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PANDIYAN
- respondent
STATE
Coram
M.DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court