The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR, holding that the relief sought had become infructuous. Consequently, connected petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.11.2021 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Crl.O.P.No.19896 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.No. 12977 of 2017
... Petitioners
Versus
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of the 1st respondent in F.I.R. No.X Crime No.464/2011 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/s.Inthu Karunakaran
For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference)
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in this Criminal Original Petition has become infructuous and hence this petition may be dismissed as infructuous .
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpp/gd
To
High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.19896 of 2017
BP(CO) SU(02/12/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Malathi @ Jenny @ Isabella, W/o. Daniel Methusala
Ramkumar, S/o. Paulvannan
Daniel Methusala, S/o. S.Pandian
State represented by The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch Team-XIII, Vepery, Chennai-600 007
B.S.Pyromatic India (P) Ltd.
N. SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
