This judgment is a one-line order closing a Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail. The High Court recorded that a case registration search returned no pending case against the petitioner and closed the petition without granting bail or reasons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Fifteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19834 of 2020
M.PALANISAMY [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUINDY POLICE STATION, GUINDY, CHENNAI-600 032.
For Petitioner : M/S.Y.DEVA ARUL PRAKASH Advocate
For Respondent : M/S. S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 420 of IPC in Crime No.not known, seeks anticipatory bail.
-sd/-
15/03/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GUINDY POLICE STATION, GUINDY, CHENNAI-600 032.
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S.M.PRABAHARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO. 3425
MN-29/03/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. PALANISAMY
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GUINDY POLICE STATION, GUINDY
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
