Allowed

S.a.K.Nazar M/a 53 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC26 Nov 2021CRL OP/19747/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras quashed criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner under the FSS Act, 2006. The court held that since the prosecution sanction was granted only against the manufacturing company and the petitioner was not the company or brought on record as an accused, the proceedings against him could not be sustained in law.

What did the court decide?

Quashing of C.C.No.131 of 2017 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, and closure of connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions.

S.a.K.Nazar M/a 53 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 26.11.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.19747 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 11916 & 11917 of 2017

¶6

I.S.A.K.Nazar ..Petitioner/Second Accused

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State: rep by N.Karmegam, The Food Safety Officer, Ambattur-II, Code No.524, Office of the Tamil Nadu Food Safety and Medicine Administration Department, AsooriStreet,Thiruvallur. ...Respondent/Complainant

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) call for the records and to quash all proceedings as against the petitioner in C.C.No.131 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, Chennai.

¶10

For petitioner : Mr.S.Prabakaran Senior Counsel for Mr.M.A.Gouthaman

¶11

For respondent : Mr.S.Vinothkumar Government Advocate (crl.side)

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the complaint in C.C.No.131 of 2017, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, Chennai.

¶14

It is the case of the prosecution that one Manna Health Mix, Southern Health Foods Pvt Ltd., is the manufacturer of the alleged Health Drink and the same was sent for analysis and report was received on 10.06.2014, indicating that the sample deviates from the declared value of protein. Hence the sample was sub-standard, unsafe and misbranded, as per Section 3 (1) (zx), 3 (1) (zz) (v) (x) and 3 (1) (zf) (A-i) of FSS Act, 2006. Subsequent, sample sent is also contained the same.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶17

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the complaint was filed on 12/5/2017 for the alleged commission of offence on 29/5/2014. As per Section 77 of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, the Commissioner of Food Safety, has to record the reasons in writing and accord prosecution within an extended period of upto three years. Moreover, sanction for prosecution was given only on 12/4/2017, without even ascertaining the particulars of the accused. Hence prays for quashing C.C.No.131 of 2017, pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur.

¶18

The learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent produced a letter dated 12/4/2017 of the Commissioner of Food Safety and Drug Administration, Chennai, wherein it is stated that sanction accorded to launch prosecution to the respondent herein for the food sample of Manna Health Mix, which was lifted from Annai Store, Chennai./A.1.

¶19

On a careful perusal of the same, what comes to be known is that sanction has been issued only against the Company and it is not the case of the prosecution that the present petitioner was in charge of the company and moreover, the Company is also not made as an accused. Accordingly, the entire prosecution launched against the petitioner cannot be sustained in the eye of law. Therefore, continuation of proceedings against the petitioner herein is quashed.

¶20

7.In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Proceedings in C.C.No.131 of 2017, pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, is quashed. Consequently, connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS VII)

¶23

//True Copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

shk/mvs

¶26

¶27

The Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, Chennai.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

Mr. N.Karmegam, The Food Safety Officer, Ambattur-II, Code No.524, Office of the Tamil Nadu Food Safety and Medicine Administration Department, Asoori Street,Thiruvallur.

¶30

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶31

Crl.O.P.No. 19747 of 2017

¶32

SVI(CO) RGA(10/12/2021)

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.a.K.Nazar M/a 53 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.a.K.Nazar M/a 53 Years, v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Mohan, S/O.R.Murugappan, Vs v.P.Krishnamurthi

R.Ravishankar, M/A-51 Vs a.Thennarasu

T.Raghupathy, M/A.48 Years Vs State Rep.by

Madasamy, 68 Yrs, Vs Inspector of Police

S.Baskaran, M/a 52 Years, Vs the State Rep by Its

T Sournavel, Vs S. Krishnaveni