Dismissed

Suresh Pandian (M/47) v. State Rep.by Its

Madras HC9 Dec 2021CRL OP/19399/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed to quash an FIR. The court observed the petitioner was not interested in prosecution but sought to sabotage the investigation. The petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution, and a pure order directed police to investigate.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Original Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; Police directed to file final report within two months.

Suresh Pandian (M/47) Vs State Rep.by Its — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 09.12.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

CRL. O.P. NO. 19399 OF 2017 AND CRL.M.P.NO.11727 OF 2017

¶6

Suresh Pandian . . . Petitioner/ Accused

¶7

Versus

¶8

1.The State,Rep by The Inspector of Police, W-19, All Women's Police Station, Adyar Chennai. Crime No.2/2017 ... 1^st Respondent/ Complainant 2.Anitha Devi Suresh ... 2^nd Respondent/ Defacto Complainant

¶9

PRAYER :

¶10

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records comprised in FIR dated 01.04.2017, registered as Crime No:2 of 2017, pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-19 All Women's Police Station, Adyar, Chennai, and quash the same.

¶11

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.R.Kishore Kumar Government Advocate Crl.Side for R1

¶12

ORDER

¶13

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the criminal proceedings in FIR dated 01.04.2017, registered as Crime No:2 of 2017, pending on the file of the Inspector of Police, W-19 All Women's Police Station, Adyar, Chennai.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

There is no representation for the petitioner. It seems

¶16

that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this matter rather interested in subotage of the investigation. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶17

3.The police is directed to carry out the investigation and file a final report within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

psa/asr

¶23

¶24

The Inspector of Police,

¶25

W-19 All Women's Police Station, Adyar, Chennai.

¶26

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶27

Crl. O.P. No. 19399 of 2017

¶28

GPL(CO) PM/27/12/2021

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Suresh Pandian (M/47) v. State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Pandian (M/47) v. State Rep.by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Manokaran, Vs M. Selvaraj, Proprietor

Tmt.J.Vijayalakshmi, Vs State by

S.Anandan, Age 53 Yrs, Vs R.Jaya

Y.P.Ravi Vs Iop J-6, Thiruvanmiyur Ps Chennai

Mohamed F.Ashik, Vs the State by

G.K.Narayansami, Aged 66 Years Vs