Dismissed

R.Selvakumar, MALE/31 Years v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC22 Nov 2021CRL OP/18490/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed to quash criminal proceedings as infructuous, noting that the trial court had already acquitted the petitioner in another case dating back to March 2019. The connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

R.Selvakumar, MALE/31 Years Vs the State Rep. by — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.11.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.NO.18490 OF 2017 AND

¶6

CRL.M.P.NOS.11258 & 11637 OF 2017

¶7

R.Selvakumar

¶8

R.Samiyathal

¶9

... Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Velur, Namakkal District.

¶12

G.Ananthi (R2 is impleaded as per the order passed by this Hon'ble Court dated 15.09.2017 made in CRL.M.P.No.11637 of 2017 in CRL.O.P.No.18490 of 2017).

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

PRAYER:-

¶15

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records of C.C.No.37 of 2017 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi, Namakkal District and Quash the same.

¶16

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Rajesh

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar for R1 Government Advocate(Crl. side) No appearance for R2

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceeding laid down in C.C.No.37 of 2017, pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi, Namakkal District.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

¶22

as well as Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.

¶23

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the

¶24

learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the case is ended in aquittal on 06.03.2019 before the learned Judicial Magistrate Paramathi, Namakkal District, in C.C.No.37 of 2017.

¶25

In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

shk/mvs

¶31

¶32

The Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi, Namakkal District.

¶33

-Do- Thro The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Namakkal.

¶34

The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Velur, Namakkal District. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶35

CRL.O.P.No.18490 of 2017

¶36

PCH(CO) PBS/03/12/2021

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Selvakumar, MALE/31 Years v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Selvakumar, MALE/31 Years v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Samuel Aron, M/40 Vs State Rep. by

Jeevitha Gopinath, M/a 29 Yrs, Vs Suresh Kumar Jindal

Mr.Jaganathan, Aged 72 Years, Vs R.Nandhini

Banumathi, F/A-52 Vs the State by

Zahir Hussain (44)(A-2) Vs the State by

V.Balakrishnan Vs State Rep. by