The Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of a Sanction to Proceed order became infructuous as the impugned order was already disposed of by the lower court on 10.10.2018. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.
Criminal Original Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Crl.O.P.No.1431 of 2016
and Crl.M.P.Nos.663 and 664 of 2016
Vasu
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records relating to S.T.C.No.188 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panruti and quash the same as illegal.
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records relating to S.T.C.No.188 of 2013 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panruti and quash the same as illegal.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the S.T.C.No.188 of 2013 has been disposed of by the Court below on 10.10.2018 itself and nothing survives in this Criminal Original Petition. Therefore, he prayed to dismiss the same.
3.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the S.T.C.No.188 of 2013 has been disposed of on 10.10.2018, this Criminal Original Petition become infructuous.
4.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Jer
To
The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Panruti.
Crl.O.P.No.1431 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.Nos.663 and 664 of 2016
BR(CO) CB(18/06/2021)
Vasu
V. Bhavani Subbaroyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
