Allowed

Raman Chowdry@ Raman Kumar Choudhary v. State by

Madras HC21 Jun 2021CRL OP/13986/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust involving a money dispute. The order was issued based on the amicable settlement reached between parties during mediation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest under specific conditions including daily reporting, surety bond execution, and prohibition of absconding or tampering with evidence.

Raman Chowdry@ Raman Kumar Choudhary Vs State by — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 21.06.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.13986 of 2020

¶6

Raman Chowdry @ Raman Kumar Choudhary ...Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State represented by The Inspector of Police, J-2 Adyar Police Station, Chennai 600 020.

¶9

...Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to grant an order of anticipatory bail, directing that the petitioner be enlarged on bail in the event of his arrest in J-2 Police Station Crime No.33 of 2020 on the file of the respondent.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.Prakash Goklaney

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 406 and 420 IPC in Cr.No.33 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a money dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant. The petitioner is an employee under the defacto complainant and he said to have misappropriated an amount to the tune of Rs.5,50,000. Hence the defacto complainant has lodged a complaint before the law enforcing agency.

¶16

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. However, the matter has been referred for mediation and there was an amicable settlement between the parties and a major portion of the amount has been settled. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶17

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that in the mediation, there was an amicable settlement and major portion of the amount

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

has been settled to the defacto complainant.

¶20

Considering the nature of case that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶22

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶23

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

¶24

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶25

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶26

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶27

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶28

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶29

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

¶32

1 THE IX METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE SAIDAPET, CHENNAI.

¶33

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE [FOR INFORMATION].

¶34

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J-2, ADYAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 600 020.

¶35

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶36

+1 CC to M/S. PRAKASH GOKLANEY Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 7062

CRL OP.13986/2020

Date :21/06/2021

MN-14/07/2021

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Raman Chowdry@ Raman Kumar Choudhary v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raman Chowdry@ Raman Kumar Choudhary v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jayaseelan Vs State Rep.by

G.Kalaiyarasan Vs State Rep.by

Vennila Vs State Rep.by

Uthayakumar Vs State Rep by

M.Shekar Vs the State Rep. by

R.Naveen Vs State Rep. by