The High Court at Madras applied for permission to withdraw a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn upon recording the counsel's submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Ninth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13855 of 2021
1 MAHENDRAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 SENTHIL 3 SETHURAMAN
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUPATTIAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPPATTINAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 571 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S. N.CHINNARAJ Advocate
For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw this petition.
-sd/-
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
CC to M/S. N.CHINNARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges
CRL OP.13855/2021
Date :09/08/2021
INBA 18/08/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for anticipatory bail should be allowed or denied.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MAHENDRAN
SENTHIL
SETHURAMAN
STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUDUPATTIAM POLICE STATION, NAGAPPATTINAM DISTRICT
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
