Kuppan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. wherein the court noted that the petitioner had already been arrested and consequently closed the petition without granting relief.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13800 of 2021
KUPPAN
[ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]
Vs
STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAILAM POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 40 OF 2021.
For Petitioner : M/S.SWAMISUBRAMANIAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner apprehending arrest for an alleged offence under Section 379 IPC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KUPPAN
- respondent
STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAILAM POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT
Coram
M. DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court