Allowed

Srinuvasan @ Srinivasan v. State Rep.by

Madras HC5 Aug 2021CRL OP/13605/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Section 482 CrPC regarding a crime under the SC/ST Act, the court directed the petitioner to surrender within two weeks. The trial court must then consider the bail application on the merits on the same day after issuing notice to victims under Section 15-A(3) of the SC/ST Act.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to surrender before the trial court within two weeks; the trial court must hear the bail application on merits same day after notice to victims.

Srinuvasan @ Srinivasan Vs State Rep.by — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 05.08.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶5

CRL.O.P.No.13605 of 2021

¶6

Srinuvasan @ Srinivasan

¶7

...Petitioner

¶8

Versus The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, VillupuramDistrict. ...Respondent (Crime No.266 of 2021)

¶9

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the learned District & Sessions Judge, (Special Court under SC & ST Atrocities Act) Villupuram, Villupuram District , to accept the surrender of the petitioner herein concerned in Crime NO.266 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District and consider the bail petition on the same day itself.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr. M.R.Elavarasan For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodharan, Gov. Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition has been filed seeking a direction, to direct the District & Sessions Judge, (Special Court under SC & ST Atrocities Act) Villupuram, Villupuram District, to accept the surrender of the petitioner and consider the petitioner's bail application on the same day in Crime No.266 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶13

In view of the amendments made in the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, this Court is of the view that the usual directions that were issued by this Court cannot be issued routinely in all cases. Therefore, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

trial Court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order or after commencement of normal functioning of the Court, which ever is later and on such surrender, the learned District & Sessions Judge, (Special Court under SC & ST Atrocities Act) Villupuram, Villupuram District, shall deal with the matter on the same day on merits and in accordance with law, after issuing notice to the victims under Section 15-A (3) of the SC/ST Act.

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above directions.

¶17

//True Copy//

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

mrp

¶20

¶21

The Principla District & Sessions Judge, (Special Court under SC & ST Atrocities Act) Villupuram, Villupuram District

¶22

The Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram Distlrict.

¶23

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶24

+1cc to Mr.M.R.Elavarasan, Advocate, S.R.No.38262

¶25

CRL.O.P.No.13605 of 2021

¶26

SSD(CO) RGA(23/08/2021)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Srinuvasan @ Srinivasan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srinuvasan @ Srinivasan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Mondal Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep.by

M.Selvam Vs the State Rep.by

S.Sounthiram Vs State Rep by

K.Nagaraj Vs State Rep by

Mohamed Sheriff Vs State Rep.by

M.Syed Mohammed Vs the Inspector of Police