High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent without representation. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.11.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
CRL. O.P. NO.13517 OF 2017 AND CRL.M.P.NOS. 8722 AND 8723 OF 2017
Riyaz @ Rayeez Ahmed ...Petitioner / Single Accused
Vs.
1.The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, J-6,Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Chennai – 41. ...1st Respondent / Complainant Crime No.1221 of 2016.
2.Swetha ...2nd Respondent / Complainant
PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in C.C.No.85 of 2017, on the file of the XVIIIth Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai in C.C.No.85 of 2017 and quash the same.
ORDER
When the Criminal Original petition was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Assistant Registrar(CO)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar
msv
To
1.The Inspector of Police, J-6,Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Chennai - 41. 2.The XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl. O.P. No.13517 of 2017 and Crl.M.P.Nos. 8722 and 8723 of 2017
SVI(CO) RVM(30/11/2021)
Riyaz @ Rayeez Ahmed
The State
Swetha
N. SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
