objection, the same was cancelled. Thereafter, the 2 nd respondent was approached by the petitioners/accused and A6 and A7 to sell 11 cents of land in both the survey numbers, since these two lands are the vital links and adjoining the main road giving access to the gated project 'Mahindra City', otherwise the entire project would bit a road block. The Mahindra City was developed over hundreds of acres. But for these two lands, the value of the property would not get appreciated and the project of A7 would become a failure. Somehow to succeed in the project and to make huge profit, A7 through A6 and the other accused had created forged power of attorney in respect of the property of the 2 nd respondent. Subsequently, through document Nos.283 & 340 of 1999, got executed, agreement including the disputed property and other properties to A7 on 28.08.2000 by document No.2532 of 2000. Now the gated community industrial project has been put in place and A7 made huge profits. A7 now is in the process of launching second phase. It is seen from the power of attorney executed by A1 and A2, the property in survey No.118/6B of 6 cents are clearly mentioned. The 2 nd respondent sent a legal notice during May 2011 to all the petitioners and other two accused, informing about the creation of forged documents and using the same execution of sale deed with regard to the disputed property, asking to cancel
