Allowed

S.B.Sirajudeen v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Jun 2021CRL OP/10755/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding charges under the Essential Commodities Act for selling black fungus medicines, the High Court of Madras granted bail conditioned on the petitioner depositing Rs. 2,00,000 for affected persons and executing a surety bond.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest subject to conditions including depositing Rs. 2,00,000 and executing a bond of Rs. 10,000.

S.B.Sirajudeen Vs Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 22.06.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.10755 of 2021

¶6

SB.Sirajudeen ..Petitioner

¶7

-Vs-

¶8

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tambara Police Station, St. Thomas Mount, Chennai. Crime No.440 of 2021. Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.PC to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with the crime No.440 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER

¶11

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences publishable under Section 7(1)(a)(i) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.440 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶12

The case of the prosecution is that one Saravanan was selling medicines for the treatment of Black Fungus disease in the black market. Upon receiving such information, when the respondent police along with Drug Inspector and other officials conducted search at the gate of Hindu Mission Hospital, they caught one Saravanan, who possess a bag containing the medicine for black fungus disease. Based on his confession, the petitioner has also involved in this case.

¶13

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. On instructions, he further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in favour of the Health Secretary, Health

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

Department, Chennai-9 without prejudice to his contention and prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate submitted that the petitioner purchased the medicines for black fungus from the petitioner and the same was selling in black market to general public with higher price. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel that the respondent police has seized the entire materials, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions;

¶18

Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the copy of this order is made ready, the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Tambaram, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

¶19

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

¶20

[b] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.2,00,000/(Rupees Two lakhs only) as non-refundable deposit either through RTGS/NEFT/cash or demand draft in favour of the Secretary to Government, Health Department, Secretariat, Chennai for the treatment of the Black Fungus affected persons, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

¶21

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶22

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶23

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶24

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

[g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶27

-sd/-

¶28

22/06/2021

¶29

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶30

TRUE COPY

¶31

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶32

¶33

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-I, TAMBARAM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPET [FOR INFORMATION]. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMBARAM POLICE STATION, ST.THOMAS MOUNT, CHENNAI. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶34

5 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, CHENNAI.

¶35

+1 CC to M/S R.BHARATH KUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 6757

¶36

CRL OP.10755/2021 Date :22/06/2021

¶37

MN-02/07/2021

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.B.Sirajudeen v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.B.Sirajudeen v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Viji Vs State Rep.by

M.Suresh Vs the State Rep by Its

Shanmugam Vs State Rep.by

Gomathi Vs State Rep by

Aravindh Kumar Vs Inspector of Police

Senthil @ Senthilkumar Vs Inspector of Police