Selva v. S.Boothathan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought time extension via Section 482 Cr.P.C. as paid joint compromise memo. Court disposed petition noting settlement.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed noting parties settled the dispute via joint compromise memo.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Monday, the Twenty Second day of March Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice R.THARANI CRL MP(MD). No.1952 of 2021 in
CRL RC (MD) No.507 of 2011
Selva ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs S.Boothathan ... Respondent/Respondent
Prayer :-
This Petition filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C to extend the time limit granted by this Honourable Court in Crl.R.C.(MD) No.507 of 2011, dated 12/06/2019 for depending the ordered amount.
Prayer in Crl.RC(MD)No.507 of 2011 :-
Petition filed under section 397 r/w 401 Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pertaining to the Judgment in C.A.No.95 of 2009 on the file of the I Additional District Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli dated 09.04.2010 confirming the conviction by the Judgment in C.C.No.270 of 2005 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.4 Tirunelveli dated 15.10.2009 and set aside the same.
ORDER:- This Petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Thiru.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Thiru.R.Karunanidhi, Advocate for the respondent, this Court made the following order:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Selva
- respondent
S. Boothathan
Coram
R. Tharani
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court