V.Nedumaran v. Amrish
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court corrected clerical errors in a previous order. It rectified the mention of the crime number from 4 of 2019 to 21 of 2021 and clarified that proceedings were quashed only against the petitioner, Amrish, not all accused.
What did the court decide?
Correction of the crime number in the impugned order and clarification that proceedings were quashed against the petitioner alone.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.9545 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.10427 of 2021
Crl.M.P.No.9545 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.10427 of 2021
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed to clarify the order in Crl.O.P.No.10427 of 2021 dated 15.06.2021 in paragraph No.4, the crime No.4 of 2019 is mentioned instead of Crime No.21 of 2021 and
further, in paragraph No.5 is mentioned that “in the result, this criminal original petition stands allowed and as sequel, the proceedings in Crime
No.21 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, is quashed.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioner/defacto complainant
submits that this Court on 15.06.2021 passed an order in
Crl.O.P.No.10427 of 2021 and in the said order, in paragraph No.4, it has
been mistakenly mentioned as Crime No.4 of 2019 instead of Crime
No.21 of 2021 and in paragraph No.5, it is stated that the proceedings in Crime No.21 of 2021, on the file of the 1st respondent police, is quashed
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
To correct clerical errors in the order dated 15.06.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.10427 of 2021 regarding the crime number and the extent of quashing against the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AMRISH
- respondent
THE STATE
Coram
M.NIRMAL KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court