Allowed

The Commissioner of Police v. S.Umamaheswari, Chennai

Madras HC20 Sept 2021CRL MP/9014/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In response to a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Court directed the designated Inspector of Police at the Crime Branch to complete the investigation and file the final charging sheet with the Magistrate Court by March 31, 2022, within an extended timeframe.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete investigation and file final report before the Jurisdictional Magistrate Court on or before 31.03.2022.

The Commissioner of Police Vs S.Umamaheswari, Chennai — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Twentieth day of September Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice C.V. KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.9014 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.8537/2013

¶8

1 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, OFFICER OF THE COMMISSIONER, EGMORE, CHENNAI-600 008.

¶9

2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ADYAR DISTRICT, CHENNAI-600 020

¶10

3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-600 015

¶11

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ...1TO4PETITIONER/RESPONDENT R6, KUMARAN NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 083.

¶12

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ..5^th PETITIONER/INVESTIGATION OFFICER OCU, CHENNAI CITY-1, EGMORE, CHENNAI-08.

¶13

¶14

S.UMA MAHESWARI [ RESPONDENT/PETITIONER ]

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant extension of time for a period of six months for completion of investigation as per the order dated 01.11.2019 made in Crl.O.P.No.8537/2013 and thus render justice.

¶16

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.E.RAJ THILAK Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) for the Petitioner the court made the following order:-

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

A direction is given to the Inspector of Police, Crime Branch CID, OCU, Chennai City-I, Egmore, Chennai-08, to complete investigation and file final report before the Jurisdictional Magistrate Court, on or before 31.03.2022.

¶19

-sd/20/09/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,3 OFFICER OF THE COMMISSIONER, EGMORE, CHENNAI-600 008.

¶25

2 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ADYAR DISTRICT, CHENNAI-600 020.

¶26

3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-600 015. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R.6 KUMARAN NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI-600 083.

¶27

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBCID, CHENNAI. 6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH CID, OCU,CHENNAI CITY-I, EGMORE CHENNAI-08.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

7 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶30

C.C. to MR.E. RAJ THILAK Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶31

Order in CRL MP.9014/2021 in CRL OP.8537/2013 Date :20/09/2021 From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶32

CSK 01/10/2021

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Commissioner of Police v. S.Umamaheswari, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Commissioner of Police v. S.Umamaheswari, Chennai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Sakthivel Vs State Rep by

M/S.Moser Baer Entertainment Vs M/S.Sun Tv Network Ltd.

Vijaya Ganesh Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

S.Arumugam Vs B.Sathiya @ Sathiya Bala

R.Veluswamy Vs State Rep by

M/S.Unmatched Solution Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.Redington (India) Ltd.