Allowed

Ramachandren v. State Rep by

Madras HC6 Jan 2021CRL MP/8715/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to relax a bail condition requiring petitioners to report to police daily and weekly. The court observed the petitioners' compliance and relaxed the strict reporting schedule, though interrogation remains required as needed.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the condition requiring petitioners to report to police on every day at 10.30 a.m. and thereafter every Monday at 10.30 a.m., provided they appear for interrogation as required.

Ramachandren Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.01.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Crl.M.P.No.8715 of 2020

¶6

¶7

Crl.O.P.No.13810 of 2020

¶8

1.Ramachandren 2.Shanthi 3.Karthika ... Petitioners

¶9

Vs.

¶10

State Rep by, Inspector of Police, Puliampatty Police Station, Erode District. (Crime No.621 of 2020). ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to relax the condition in para No.6(b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders by order of this Court on 07.09.2020 in Crl.O.P.No.13810 of 2020.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.P.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶13

ORDER

¶14

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶15

This petition has been filed for relaxation of the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13810 of 2020, dated 07.09.2020 in para No.6(b) that the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every day at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have been complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13810 of 2020, dated 07.09.2020, regularly and hence, he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶17

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would also submit that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

4.Considering the above submissions, the condition imposed as against the petitioners by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.13810 of 2020, dated 07.09.2020, is relaxed. However, the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶20

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

06/01/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
SATHYAMANGALAM
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
PULIAMPATTY POLICE STATION,
ERODE DISTRICT.
C.C. to M/S. P.SARAVANAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
Order
in
CRL MP.8715/2020
in
CRL OP.13810/2020
Date :06/01/2021

¶23

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶24

RVR 19/01/2021

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramachandren v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramachandren v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ponnusamy Vs State by

Nandakumar Vs the State Represented by

Saravanan Vs State Rep by

Av Daniel Vs the State Rep by

Sampath@Sampath Kumar Vs State Rep.by

Kali Vs the State Rep. by