A single-judge criminal miscellaneous petition filed to condone limitation delay was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel formally withdrew the petition during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.01.2021
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN
Crl.M.P.No.8559 of 2020 IN Crl.R.C.(SR) No.37284 of 2020
Sathiyaseelan ...Petitioner
Vs. State rep.by the Inspector of Police, Thittacherry Police Station, Nagapattinam District, Crime No.201 of 2019. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 16 days in filing the Revision Sr. 37284/2020 sought to be preferred against the order passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam in Crl.M.P.No.3542 of 2019 in Crime No.201 of 2019 on the file of the respondent, dated 26.11.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jawahar For Respondent : Mr.A.Madhan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the miscellaneous petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Crl.M.P.No.8559 of 2020
IN Crl.R.C.(SR) No.37284 of 2020
SSI(CO)
SP(02/02/2021)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sathiyaseelan
State rep.by the Inspector of Police, Thittacherry Police Station, Nagapattinam District
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
