Allowed

Madheshwaran v. the State Rep. by

Madras HC24 Aug 2021CRL MP/8223/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court relaxed the condition in an anticipatory bail order requiring the petitioner to report daily to police. The petitioner was now directed to appear only upon summons for interrogation, while other conditions remained. Disposition: Allowed.

What did the court decide?

The condition to report daily at 10.30 a.m. was modified; petitioner shall appear only when summoned for interrogation.

Madheshwaran Vs the State Rep. by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.8223 of 2021

IN CRL OP.11418/2021

MADHESHWARAN

[ PETITIONER ]

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 67/1, BAZAAR STREET, POLICE COLONY, PAPARAPATTI POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.330 OF 2021.

¶12

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that “the petitioners shall report beore the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders” imposed in para no.8 (d) of the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.11418 of 2021 dated 02.07.201 in Crime No.330 of 2021.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.THIRUMOORTHY, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶15

Vide Order dated 02.07.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on anticipatory bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶16

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶17

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 02.07.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶20

-sd/-

¶21

24/08/2021

¶22

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶23

TRUE COPY

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PENNAGARAM.

¶27

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DHARMAPURI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶28

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶29

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 67/1, BAZAAR STREET, POLICE COLONY, PAPARAPATTI POLICE STATION, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT.

¶30

5 THE CHAIRMAN/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT MINERAL FOUNDATION TRUST, DHARMAPURI.

¶31

C.C. to M/S. R.THIRUMOORTHY Advocate on payment of necessary charges

Order

in CRL MP.8223/2021

CRL OP.11418/2021

Date :24/08/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TA-13/09/2021

Madheshwaran v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madheshwaran v. the State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmipriya Vs State Rep by

Manikandan Vs State Rep.by

Arumugam Vs State Rep by

G.Rajeev @ Raj Vs the State Rep by

Munichandira Vs the State Rep by

A.Kolanchi Vs State Rep by