Allowed

Kala v. State Rep.by

Madras HC17 Aug 2021CRL MP/7894/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras entertained a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking extension of time granted in an earlier order for the petitioners to surrender and furnish sureties under anticipatory bail. Finding the reasons in the affidavit sufficient, the court extended the time by two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Time is extended by a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the order for the petitioners to surrender and execute sureties.

Kala Vs State Rep.by — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7894 of 2021

¶7

¶8

CRL OP.6843/2021

¶9

1 KALA [ PETITIONERS ] 2 KOKILA 3 A.ARUNACHALAM

¶10

¶11

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-8, KELAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT. CR.NO.27 OF 2021

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time given in order dated 17.04.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.6843/2021 for the petitioners to surrender and furnish surety.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. G.MAGESHKUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioners and of MR.C.E.PRATAP Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide order dated 17.04.2021, this Court had granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking extension of time to surrender.

¶15

Being satisfied with the reasons shown in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the prayer sought for by the petitioners deserves to be considered favorably.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, time is extended by a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order for the petitioners to surrender before the concerned Court and execute the sureties. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

17/08/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶23

¶24

1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, CHENGALPATTU.

¶25

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU [FOR INFORMATION]

¶26

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-8, KELAMBAKKAM POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

¶28

5 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, CHENGALPATTU.

¶29

+1 C.C. to M/S. G.MAGESHKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.8791

¶30

Order in CRL MP.7894/2021 in CRL OP.6843/2021 Date :17/08/2021

¶31

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶32

RW 01/09/2021

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kala v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kala v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Navin @ Navinkumar Vs State Rep.by

Anbalagan Vs the State Rep. by

S.Thiyagarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Nagarajan Vs the State Rep by Its

M.Vanitha Vs N.Prabhu

Pothiskumar @ Sabari Vs the State Rep by