Allowed

Imran Noorullah v. State, Rep. by

Madras HC3 Aug 2021CRL MP/7444/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras relaxed a daily reporting condition for a convict, modifying it to require appearance before police only on Mondays until the charge sheet was filed, based on the respondent's submission of full compliance.

What did the court decide?

The condition to appear daily before police was modified to require appearance only on every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until the charge sheet is filed.

Imran Noorullah Vs State, Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Third day of August Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.7444 of 2021

IN CRL OP.11240/2021

IMRAN NOORULLAH

STATE, REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANDASI SOUTH POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.130 OF 2021.

¶11

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the bail condition (e) that the Petitioner shall report before the Respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, imposed on the Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.11240 of 2021 dated 30.06.2021

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. V.R.APPASWAMEE, Advocate for the petitioner, and of M/S.C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide Order dated 30.06.2021, this Court had relaxed the condition and directed that the petitioner to appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶15

The present petition has been filed seeking modification of the said condition,

¶16

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶17

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶18

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 30.06.2021 alone stands modified that till filing of the charge sheet, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30 a.m, and thereafter, the petitioner is directed to appear before the concerned court on each and every hearing dates at 10.30 a.m, until further orders. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

03/08/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VANDAVASI.

¶26

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶27

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VANDASI SOUTH POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

¶29

+1 C.C. to M/S. V.R.APPASWAMEE Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.8071

Order

CRL MP.7444/2021

in CRL OP.11240/2021

Date :03/08/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶36

TA-09/08/2021

Imran Noorullah v. State, Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Imran Noorullah v. State, Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maheswari @ Mageshwari Vs State Rep.by

Rajesh Kumar Vs State Rep by

Deivasigammani @ Asaikutty Vs the State Rep by

Sudharsan Muniraja Vs Anuradha

K.Sivakumar, Vs S.Vijayalakshmi

Thiru.Karthikeyan Vs Tmt.Amsaveni