Allowed

S.Munusamy v. State Rep. by

Madras HC29 Jul 2021CRL MP/7239/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras issued an order allowing the petitioner's request to amend a prior bail order. The court directed the registry to change the satisfaction magistrate from Judicial Magistrate-III to District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tirupattur, based on the reasons stated in the petition.

What did the court decide?

Registry directed to amend the Bail Order dated 08.07.2021 to reflect satisfaction by District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tirupattur, instead of Judicial Magistrate-III.

S.Munusamy Vs State Rep. by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 29.07.2021

¶2

CORAM :

¶3

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

Crl.MP.No.7239 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.11795 of 2021

¶5

S.Munusamy ... Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

StateRep. By The Inspector of Police, 805, Alangayam Police Station, Alangayam, Thirupattur District. ... Respondent. (Crime No.148 of 2021)

¶8

PRAYER : Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to amend the Satisfaction Magistrate in the order dated 08.07.2021 in Crl.OP.No.11795 as Bail to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Tirupattur instead of Bail to the Satisfaction of learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tirupattur by allowing the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Stalin

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.C.E.Pratap Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶11

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶14

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner/accused to amend the Satisfaction Magistrate as learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Tirupattur instead of learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Tirupattur in the order dated 08.07.2021 made in Crl.OP.No.11795 of 2021.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the petition, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered as prayed for. Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the order dated 08.07.2021 passed in Crl. O.P. No.11795 of 2021 and issue a fresh order copy to the parties.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

29/07/2021

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 DISTRICT MUNSIFF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPATTUR.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE DISTRICT [FOR INFORMATION]

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, 805, ALANGAYAM POLICE STATION, ALANGAYAM, THIRUPATTUR DISTRICT.

¶26

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶27

5 THE CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER, THIRUPATTUR DISTRICT

¶28

+1 C.C. to M/S. V.STALIN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 7862

Order

in CRL MP.7239/2021

CRL OP.11795/2021

Date :29/07/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶35

RW 05/08/2021

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Munusamy v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Munusamy v. State Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Jeevan Kumar Vs the State Rep.by

Sunil Vs State by

Muniyammal Vs State

R.Devaram Vs the Disignated Officer

Arundev Pillappan Vs the Commissioner of Police

Marudhapandian Vs State by