Allowed

Iyyappan v. State Represented by

Madras HC27 Jan 2021CRL MP/705/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed to relax the bail condition of daily reporting. The court relaxed the mandatory reporting requirement, directing the petitioner to appear only as and when required by the police, noting regular compliance by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

The condition to report daily at 10.30 a.m. is relaxed; the petitioner is directed to appear before the police as and when required.

Iyyappan Vs State Represented by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of January Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.705 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.20546/2020

¶8

IYYAPPAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶9

Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-3, KORATTUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO.2271/2020

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on him by the Hon'ble Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders in Crl.O.P.No.20546/2020 order dated 22.12.2020

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. P.PARTHIPAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

This petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this Court against the petitioner directing him to report before the Respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.20546 of 2020 dated 22.12.2020.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.20546 of 2020 dated 22.12.2020, is relaxed, however the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶19

-sd/-
27/01/2021
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
AMBATTUR.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
THIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
T-3, KORATTUR POLICE STATION,
THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.
+1C.C. to M/S. P.PARTHIPAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR NO.963
Order
in
CRL MP.705/2021
in
CRL OP.20546/2020
Date :27/01/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶20

MK:03/02/2021

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Iyyappan v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Iyyappan v. State Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvam Vs State Rep by

A.Gopi Vs State Rep by

Yuvaraj Vs the State Rep.by

Arivazhagan @ Arivu Vs State by

Ravikumar Vs State Rep. by

L.Murugasamy Vs State Rep by