Allowed

Rohan @ Rohan D Premkumar v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC27 Apr 2021CRL MP/6940/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court, in a criminal miscellaneous petition, considered a prayer to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner-accused in a separate criminal court pending the conclusion of connected petitions. The court granted the prayer and dispensed with the appearance.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of the petitioner in connection with C.C.No.53 of 2020 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Coonoor, is dispensed with.

Rohan @ Rohan D Premkumar Vs the State Rep.by — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M. NIRMAL KUMAR

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.6940 of 2020

¶7

IN CRL OP.17794/2020

¶8

ROHAN @ ROHAN D PREMKUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ]

¶9

Vs 1 THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT NO.01 / COMPLAINANT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WELLINGTON POLICE STATION, THE NILGIRIS. CR.NO.163 OF 2017.

¶10

2 COLONEL RAJNEESH SINGH GAUR [ RESPONDENT NO.02 / DEFENCE STAFF SERVICE COLLEGE, DE FACTO COMPLAINANT ] WELLINGTON, THE NILGIRIS.

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.OP.No.17794/2020 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to dispense with the personal appearace of the petitioner in connection with the C.C.No.53 of 2020 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Coonoor, pending disposal of the above Crl.OP.No.17794/2020.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.OP.NO.17794/2020 of On the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. S.MANURAJ, Advocate for the petitioner and M/S.M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 1^st Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

The personal appearace of the petitioner in connection with the C.C.No.53 of 2020 pending on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate, Coonoor, be and hereby is dispensed with.

¶15

-sd/27/04/2021

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶17

TRUE COPY

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
COONOOR.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
THE NILGIRIS [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
WELLINGTON POLICE STATION,
THE NILGIRIS.
C.C. to M/S. S.MANURAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges
Order
in
CRL MP.6940/2020
in
CRL OP.17794/2020
Date :27/04/2021

¶19

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format cs 24/05/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rohan @ Rohan D Premkumar v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohan @ Rohan D Premkumar v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramachandriran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

R.Kamatchi Vs M.Ramasamy

Radha Krishnan Vs the Deputy Superintendent of Police

M.Manimegalai Vs State by

I.Fathima Nachiyar Vs the State Rep.by

P.N.Ajjan Vs the Inspector of Police