Disposed

Murugan v. the State Rep by

Madras HC27 Jan 2021CRL MP/633/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.633 of 2021, the Madras High Court granted an extension of two weeks to a petitioner to comply with a conditional order regarding anticipatory bail. The court warned that failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the bail petition.

What did the court decide?

Two weeks granted to comply with the conditional order; failure to comply results in automatic dismissal of the anticipatory bail petition.

Murugan Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of January Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.633 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.18525/2020

¶8

1 MURUGAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 THAMILSELVAN

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAGUDANCHAVADI POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to extend the time granted in Crl.O.P.No.18525 of 2020 order dated 07.12.2020 in Crime No.490 of 2019

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. D.ARUN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR. S.KARTHIKEYAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶13

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to extend the time to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order dated 07.12.2020 made in Crl.O.P.No.18525 of 2020.

¶14

Heard both sides.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this petition is ordered and two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to comply with the conditional order passed by this Court, from the date on which the order copy made ready. Failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand automatically dismissed.

¶17

-sd/-

¶18

27/01/2021

¶19

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶20

TRUE COPY

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SANKARI, SALEM DISTRICT.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SALEM [FOR INFORMATION]

¶25

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAGUDANCHAVADI POLICE STATION,

¶27

SALEM DISTRICT

¶28

+1C.C. to M/S. D.ARUN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.976

Order

CRL MP.633/2021

CRL OP.18525/2020

Date :27/01/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶36

MK:04/02/2021

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Murugan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugan v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvam Vs State Rep by

A.Gopi Vs State Rep by

Yuvaraj Vs the State Rep.by

Arivazhagan @ Arivu Vs State by

Ravikumar Vs State Rep. by

L.Murugasamy Vs State Rep by