Karthick v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court relaxed a bail condition in Crl.O.P. No.3196/2021, modifying the reporting frequency from daily to once a month.
What did the court decide?
Petitioners directed to report before the Respondent Police on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. instead of daily.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty Third day of April Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.5141 of 2021
IN CRL OP.3196/2021
1 KARTHICK
2 RAJINIKANTH
Vs
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MAYILADUTHURAI POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT. CR.NO.191 OF 2021.
[ RESPONDENT ]
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions imposed on the petitioner shall report before the respondent, daily at 10.30a.m. until further orders by an order dated 02.03.2021 passed in Crl.OP.No.3196/2021.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether relief is warranted for a relaxation of the bail condition directing daily reporting.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Karthick
- petitioner
Rajinikanth
- respondent
State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Mayiladuthurai Police Station, Nagapuram District
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court