Petitioner sought an extension of time to comply with a prior court order. The matter was dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance at hearing, inordinate delay, and lack of inclination to proceed with the case.
Extension of time for complying with the order dated 30.05.2019 was denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.4225 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019
Crl.M.P.No.4225 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to grant
extension of time for 2 weeks to comply the order of this Court, dated 30.05.2019 in Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019.
2.Earlier, the petitioner has moved a petition along with two others in Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019. This Court, by order, dated 30.05.2019 had
disposed the same with certain directions.
3.Morning, when the matter is taken up for hearing, no
representation for the petitioner either in person or by his respective counsel. Hence, the matter is passed over. At about 02.30 p.m., again the
matter is taken up for hearing, at that time also, no representation for the petitioner.
1/3
Crl.M.P.No.4225 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019
4.A perusal of the records, it could be seen that initially the order in
Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019 came to be passed on 30.05.2019. The petition
for extension of time was filed on 04.01.2021 and again, it has been
represented on 24.03.2021. Hence, there have been inordinate delay.
Further, no representation for the petitioner shows that he has got no
inclination to proceed with the case.
5.In view of the above, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands
dismissed.
08.04.2021
vv2
2/3
Crl.M.P.No.4225 of 2021 in Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
vv2
Crl.M.P.No.4225 of 2021 in
Crl.O.P.No.13829 of 2019
08.04.2021
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an extension of time for complying with a prior order should be granted in absence of the petitioner and in view of inordinate delay.
PETITIONER
M. NIRMAL KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
