Partly allowed

Srinivasan v. State Rep.by

Madras HC30 Mar 2021CRL MP/4109/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Madras High Court modified a bail condition under Crl.O.P.No.1469 of 2021. The Court relaxed the petitioner's obligation to report daily at 10.30 a.m. to the police, directing him to appear only as and when required, noting regular compliance.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required instead of daily at 10.30 a.m.

Srinivasan Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Thirtieth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.4109 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.1469/2021

¶8

SRINIVASAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED A1 ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶11

VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION ARIYALUR, ARIYALUR DISTRICT.

¶12

CR.NO.7 OF 2020

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition para 5(c) The Petitioner shall report before the Respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders in Crl.O.P.No.1469 of 2021 order dated 3.02.2021.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. R.SUBRAMANIYAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of M/S.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

This petition is filed to relax the condition imposed by this Court against the petitioner directing him to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶18

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.1469 of 2021 dated 03.02.2021.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.1469 of 2021 dated 03.02.2021, is modified and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required.

¶21

This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶22

-sd/-

¶23

30/03/2021

¶24

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶25

TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, JAYAMKONDAM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARIYALUR [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION ARIYALUR, ARIYALUR DISTRICT. 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. +1 C.C. to M/S. R.SUBRAMANIYAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.4367

¶26

Order

¶27

in CRL MP.4109/2021 in CRL OP.1469/2021 Date :30/03/2021

¶28

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format cs 21/04/2021

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Srinivasan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srinivasan v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Vadivelu Vs State of Tamilnadu

K.Babu Vs State Rep by

K.Rajendran Vs State Rep by

Sundarakrishnan Vs the State Rep.by

M.Karthiga Priyadarshini Vs the State Rep.by Its

M.Karthiga Priyadarshini Vs the State Rep.by Its