Allowed

C.Kochukrishnan v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC17 Apr 2021CRL MP/3372/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, in a criminal miscellaneous petition, extended the time granted to the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- as a condition for anticipatory bail, allowing an additional four weeks from the date of the order due to delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

What did the court decide?

The time for depositing the sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- is extended by four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

C.Kochukrishnan Vs the State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Saturday, the Seventeenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice N. SESHASAYEE

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3372 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.4466/2020 C.KOCHUKRISHNAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-4 KUNIAMUTHUR POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE CITY. CR.NO.899 OF 2019.

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to extend the time for four weeks to comply the condition which were imposed by the Honble Court, Madras by an order dated 04.02.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.8922/2020 in Crl.O.P.No.4466/2020.

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. SARAVANAN P., Advocate for the petitioner, and of M/S.KRITIKA KAMAL P. Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶10

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail and one of the conditions imposed by the Court was that, he has to deposit a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- to the credit of the Crime No.899 of 2019 before the concerned Magistrate which later came to be modified Vide the order of this Court dated 04.02.2021 in Crl.M.P.No.8922 of 2020. As per the modified order the petitioner needs to deposit only Rs.2,00,000/- instead of Rs.3,00,000/-.

¶11

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready with the money to deposit but, by the time he mobilized the funds during Covid-19, the time fixed for payment has expired. Therefore, he has filed the present petition seeking extension of time..

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

3.The time for depositing the said sum of money is extended by four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶14

-sd/-

¶15

17/04/2021

¶16

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY

¶17

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADUKKARAI,
COIMBATORE.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
COIMBATORE. [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
D-4 KUNIAMUTHUR POLICE STATION,
COIMBATORE CITY.
+1 C.C. to M/S. SARAVANAN P. Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR.NO.4953
Order
in
CRL MP.3372/2021
in
CRL OP.4466/2020
Date :17/04/2021

¶18

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶19

TA-03/05/2021

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Kochukrishnan v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Kochukrishnan v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Muthiah Vs Mrs.N.Alagammal and 4 Others

G.Muthukumar Vs a.Subramanian

C.Kalaiselvi and 3 others Vs Mr.P.Rames and 3 others

M.Marie Emilie Soubachiny Vs The Inspector General of

Mr. R.Arun., Vs Mr. V.S. Ranganathan., (Died) and 2 others

Mr.Anil Rackbchand Bafna, Vs J.Purushothamn, S/o.Jambukesan and 3 others