Allowed

Rakki @ Balaji v. the State Rep by

Madras HC18 Mar 2021CRL MP/3031/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court relaxed the bail condition requiring the petitioner to appear at a specific police station on every Sunday, allowing reporting before any other police station in the southern district while retaining the power for interrogation as required.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed on the petitioner to appear at E5,Sholavaram Police Station every Sunday at 10.30 a.m. is modified to allow appearance before any other police station in the southern district at

Rakki @ Balaji Vs the State Rep by — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Eighteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3031 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.19035/2020

¶8

RAKKI @ BALAJI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED-5 ] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E5,SHOLAVARAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.4719 OF 2020)

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to modify the condition imposed in Crl.MP.No.693/2021 in Crl.OP.No.19035/2020, order dated 03.02.2021 that “appear before the respondent police on every Sunday at 10.30a.m. until further order” it may be modify that to appear before any other police station in southern district on every Sunday at 10.30a.m. until further order.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.CHAKKARAVARTHY, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.T.SHANMUGA RAJESWARAN, Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶11

The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.693 of 2021 dated 03.02.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.19035 of 2020 directing the petitioner to appear before the respondent police on every Sunday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

¶12

The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the condition. Hence, he seeks for modification.

¶13

3.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police.

¶14

In view of the submissions of the learned Counsels, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.M.P.No.693 of 2021 dated

¶15

03.02.2021 in Crl.O.P.No.19035 of 2020 is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶16

-sd/-

¶17

18/03/2021

¶18

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶19

TRUE COPY

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-II,
PONNERI.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
THIRUVALLUR [FOR INFORMATION].
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
E5,SHOLAVARAM POLICE STATION,
THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.
5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE,
KOTTAR POLICE STATION,
NAGERCOIL.
+1 C.C. to M/S.R.CHAKKARAVARTHY Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR NO. 3687
Order
in
CRL MP.3031/2021
in
CRL OP.19035/2020
Date :18/03/2021
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ MN-24/03/2021

Rakki @ Balaji v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakki @ Balaji v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Martin Roberts Vs State Rep by

R.Devadoss Vs State Rep. by

M/S.Pgc Corporation Ltd. Vs the State Rep.by Its

Panjavarnam Vs State Represented by

V. Sankar Vs State Rep by

Kanthasamy Vs the State