Dismissed

Nishar @ Arath Nishar v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Madras HC15 Dec 2021CRL MP/12941/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the Madras High Court examined a request to suspend the petitioner's sentence in a criminal case. The court noted the petitioner was a stranger to witnesses but no test identification parade was held. Finding the petitioner a habitual offender with other pending cases, the court dismissed the petition for suspension. The revision was listed for hearing.

What the court decided

AI extract

Nishar @ Arath Nishar Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by — Madras HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of December Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.12941 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL.R.C.No.962 of 2021

¶8

NISHAR @ ARATH NISHAR [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-4, KUNIAMUTHUR POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT

¶11

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶12

CRIME NO.460 OF 2015

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner/appellant in C.C.NO. 947 of 2017 dated 19.11.2018 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII Coimbatore as cofirmed by the Judgment of the Learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore in C.A.No.551 of 2018 dated 08.01.2021 and thus render justice.

¶14

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.N.BALAKRISHNAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.S.SUGENDRAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶15

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking suspension of sentence imposed by the order dated 19.11.2018 in C.C.No.947 of 2017 and confirmed by the judgment dated 08.01.2021 in C.A.No.551 of 2018 by the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is A2 in this case. Though as per the prosecution, the petitioner is a stranger to the defacto complainant and the other witnesses, no test identification parade was conducted.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

3.Mr.S.Sugendran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent would submit that in this case, the Trial Court taking into consideration that the accused was identified in the Court, had convicted the accused and after conviction, the same was also confirmed by the Appellate Court. Apart from this case, the petitioner has got 9 other cases, out of which some are pending for trial and some are pending investigation and thereby he would object for grant suspension of sentence.

¶19

Taking into consideration of the facts of the case and that the petitioner is also a habitual offender, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking suspension of sentence is dismissed.

¶20

List the revision for hearing during the first week of February 2022.

¶21

-sd/-

¶22

15/12/2021

¶23

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶24

TRUE COPY

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.III, COIMBATORE

¶28

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COIMBATORE [FOR INFORMATION].

¶29

3 THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, COIMBATORE.

¶30

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-4, KUNIAMUTHUR POLICE STATION, COIMBATORE DISTRICT

¶31

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, COIMBATORE.

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

6 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶34

C.C. to M/S.M.N.BALAKRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges

¶35

in CRL MP.12941/2021 in

¶36

CRL RC.962/2021

¶37

Date :15/12/2021

¶38

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶39

JPA 17/12/2021

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Nishar @ Arath Nishar v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Nishar @ Arath Nishar v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kishore@Kishore Kumar Vs State by

Prakash Vs the State Repby

Manimaran Vs Sub Divisional Magistrate and Revenue Divisional Officer

N.Elangovan Vs B.Srinivasan

A.Karuppaiyah Vs M.Gnanavel

A.Sekar @ Sekar Marthandan Vs Rathna Devi