Allowed

Umanath v. State Rep.by

Madras HC11 Feb 2021CRL MP/1150/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition, the High Court relaxed the bail condition directing the petitioner to stay at Trichy. The petitioner is now directed to appear monthly at the Trial Court or file an application for extension under Section 317 Cr.P.C. if absent.

What did the court decide?

The condition of staying at Trichy and reporting daily is relaxed; petitioner must appear monthly at the Trial Court.

Umanath Vs State Rep.by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Thursday, the Eleventh day of February Two Thousand Twenty One

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. N. PRAKASH

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. SIVAGNANAM

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.1150 OF 2021

¶7

UMANATH [ PETITIONER / APPELLANT ]

¶8

¶9

STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ]

¶10

INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶11

VADALUR POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT. CRIME NO.163/2017.

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on that the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and report before the Town Police Station, Trichy daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders in Crl.MP.No.7593 of 2020 in Crl.A.No.485 of 2020 dated 21.12.2020 before this Hon'ble Court

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.C.RAMKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.PRABAKAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by P.N.PRAKASH,J)

¶15

While granting suspension of sentence and bail on 21.12.2020 in Crl.M.P.No.7593 of 2020 in Crl.A.No.485 of 2020, this Court had directed the petitioner to stay at Trichy and report before the Town Police Station, Trichy, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders, for relaxing which, this criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed.

¶16

Heard Mr.C.Ramkumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Prabhakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent/State.

¶17

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the aforesaid condition since 29.12.2020. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

In view of the above, the aforesaid condition is relaxed and the petitioner is directed to appear before the I Additional District and Sessions Court, Cuddalore, on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m. until the disposal of the appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court.

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

11/02/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, CUDDALORE.

¶23

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE [FOR INFORMATION]

¶24

3 THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CUDDALORE.

¶25

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VADALUR POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.

¶27

6 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, TRICHY.

¶28

+1C.C. to M/S.C.RAMKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.1452

¶29

Order

¶30

¶31

CRL.MP.NO.1150/2021 in CRL.A.NO.485/2020

¶32

Date :11/02/2021

¶33

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ MK:16/02/2021

Umanath v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umanath v. State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Chithra Vs The State Rep by its

A.Shanmugapriya Vs the State Rep.by Its

Union Bank of india Vs The Deputy Director

P.Saravanan Vs State Rep. by

Raman Vs State Rep.by

Raman Vs State Represented by