Allowed

S.Ezhumalai v. the State Rep by

Madras HC6 Oct 2021CRL MP/10250/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail petitioner sought relaxation of daily police reporting condition imposed in a bail order. Court allowed relaxation, modifying appearance requirement to every Monday until charge sheet filing and subsequent trial hearings.

What did the court decide?

Condition to appear daily modified to require appearance before respondent police every Monday at 10.30 a.m. until charge sheet filing, and thereafter on trial court hearing dates. All other condition

S.Ezhumalai Vs the State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Sixth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.10250 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.14399 of 2021

¶8

S.EZHUMALAI [ PETITIONER / A2 ]

¶9

¶10

THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION, SALEM (CRIME NO.5/AC/2021)

¶11

[ RESPONDENT ]

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relaxation of the condition that to report before the Respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders by an order dated 16.08.2021 made in Crl.O.P.No.14399 of 2021 and to pass such further or other orders.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. C.PRABAKARAN, Advocate for the Petitioner and of MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

Vide order dated 16.08.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶15

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the petitioner has been complying with the conditions without fail.

¶16

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer as sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 16.08.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., till filing charge sheet, thereafter, before the trail court on each and every hearing date until further orders. All other conditions remain unaltered

¶19

-sd/-

¶20

06/10/2021

¶21

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶22

TRUE COPY

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

¶24

¶25

1 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR PC ACT CASES, SALEM.

¶26

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION, SALEM

¶27

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶28

4 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER SALEM DISTRICT.

¶29

+1 C.C. to M/S. C.PRABAKARAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.11105

Order

CRL MP.10250/2021

CRL OP.14399/2021

Date :06/10/2021

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶37

JPA 20/10/2021

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Ezhumalai v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Ezhumalai v. the State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Khaja Mydeen Vs the Intelligence Officer

K.Chandran Vs State Rep by

Madhesh Vs Inspector of Police

Pyarelal Jain Vs State by

K.S.Krishnamoorthy Vs the State Rep. by

N.Mohan @ Madhaiyan Vs Aishwary Pathi