Partly allowed

Thuknashagu @ Thukunasahu v. State Rep by

Madras HC4 Oct 2021CRL MP/10090/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An HC criminal miscellaneous petition seeking modification of bail conditions. The court observed that the charge sheet was filed and acceded to the prayer. The condition to report to the Magistrate was modified to require appearance before the trial court on hearing dates.

What did the court decide?

Modified bail condition; petitioner shall appear before the trial court on each and every hearing date instead of daily reporting to the Magistrate.

Thuknashagu @ Thukunasahu Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Fourth day of October Two Thousand Twenty One

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.10090 of 2021

¶7

IN CRL OP.10537/2021

¶8

THUKNASHAGU @ THUKUNASAHU [ PETITIONER ]

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P-6, KODUNGAIYUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. CR.NO.294 OF 2021.

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to modify the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.No.10537 of 2021 dated 17.06.2021 as to the petitioner shall report to the respondent police daily at 10.30 A.M until further orders instead of the condition that the petitioner report before the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.MAGESH, Advocate for the petitioner, and of MR.A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

Vide Order dated 17.06.2021, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on bail on certain conditions. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking relaxation of the conditions.

¶14

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent, on instruction, submits that the charge sheet has been filed.

¶15

In view of the above submission, this Court is of the considered view that the prayer sought for by the petitioner could be acceded to.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Accordingly, the condition insofar as appearance as imposed by order dated 17.06.2021 alone stands modified and the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on each and every hearing date. All other conditions remain unaltered.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

04/10/2021

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶21

TRUE COPY

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO

¶23

1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.X, EGMORE, CHENNAI.

¶24

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶25

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

¶26

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, P-6, KODUNGAIYUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.

¶27

+1 C.C. to M/S. D.MAGESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.10958 Order in CRL MP.10090/2021 in CRL OP.10537/2021 Date :04/10/2021

¶28

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶29

TA-12/10/2021

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thuknashagu @ Thukunasahu v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thuknashagu @ Thukunasahu v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N. Sumi Vs Munisamy

M/s.Indo -American College Vs Nandakumar

Rajakumari Vs the State Rep by

Mohammed Idris Vs State Rep.by

Sagunthala Vs State by

M.Selvam Vs the State