Dismissed

Chemfab Alkalis Ltd., v. Protchem Industries (India)

Madras HC3 Sept 2021CP/101/2003

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A company petition for winding up and a connected application for appointing a liquidator were filed against Protchem Industries (India) Limited. The applicant's counsel recorded an instruction to withdraw both proceedings, resulting in their dismissal as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Winding up petition and connected application for appointment of liquidator dismissed as withdrawn.

Chemfab Alkalis Ltd., Vs Protchem Industries (India) — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

(ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 03^rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

Comp.Petn. No.101 of 2003 and Comp.A.No.361 of 2003

¶7

In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956(1 of 1956) and In the matter of Protchem Industries (India) Limited

¶8

Chemfab Alkalis Limited, Rep.by Mr.S.Ramesh, President (Corporate) Ganananda Place, Kalapet, Pondicherry 605 014 ...Applicant/Petitioner

¶9

-vs-

¶10

Protchem Indusries (India) Limited, Rep.by Mr.T.K.Mohan, Managing Director, Abishekapakkam, Pondicherry 605 007 ...Respondent/Respondent

¶11

Comp.Petn. No.101 of 2003

¶12

This Company Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased

¶13

to :

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (a) For an order directing the respondent company namely, M/s.

¶15

¶16

Protchem Industries (India) Limited, be wound up under the provisions

¶17

of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).

¶18

(b). For the appointment of the Official Liquidator, High Court,

¶19

Madras to take charge of the assets of the respondent company.

¶20

(c ). For an order directing the respondent company to pay the

¶21

costs.

¶22

Comp.A.No.361 of 2003 :

¶23

This Company Application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint the Official Liquidator, High Court, Madras, as the Provisional Liquidator to take charge of the affairs of the respondent company pending disposal of the above Company Petition.

¶24

This Company Petition along with Company Application coming on this day before this Court for hearing in the presence of Mr. Pawn Jabak for Mr.Harishankar Mani advocate for the petitioner/applicant in Comp.Petn. No.101 of 2003 and Comp.A.No.361 of 2003 herein and upon reading the Judges summons and affidavit of S.Ramesh filed in

¶25

herein, the court made the following order:

¶26

“Mr.Pawn Jabak, learned counsel appearing for the

¶27

petitioner would submit that he has got instructions to withdraw this petition.

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶29

¶30

2. Recording the said statement of the counsel for the

¶31

petitioner, this Company Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶32

No costs. Consequently, the connected application is also closed.

¶33

WITNESS, THE HON'BLE THE MR.JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE , CHIEF JUSTICE OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, AS AFORESAID THIS THE 03^rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021.

¶34

Sd/-

¶35

JOINT REGISTRAR(O.S)(I/C). //CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE COPY// DATED THIS THE DAY OF 2022

¶36

COURT OFFICER.

¶37

From 25 th September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decree in this format.

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

¶40

R.s/03.01.2022

¶41

Comp.Petn. No.101 of 2003

¶42

and

¶43

Comp.A.No.361 of 2003

¶44

ORDER DATED:03.09.2021

¶45

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE

¶46

R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶47

FOR APPROVAL ON: 03/01/2022

¶48

APPROVED ON:04/01/2022

¶49

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Chemfab Alkalis Ltd., v. Protchem Industries (India)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chemfab Alkalis Ltd., v. Protchem Industries (India)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Agri Development Furniture Vs M/S.Capsein Bia Lab Ltd.

M/S.Sellappapa Keeran Vs Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan & Another

M/S.Aravind Laboratories Vs Kaybee Exim Pte Ltd.

A.L.Mudaliar Vs the Registrar of Companies

Alumayer India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Larsen & Toubro Ltd.

Mr.P.Rajeshkumar Vs M/S.Sterling Tree Magnum India Pvt. Ltd. (Company in Liquidation), Rep by Official Liquidator