R.Abuthagir v. Senthi Vel
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner moved to close a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a prior writ order, submitting that respondents had indeed complied with the relief granted in W.P.(MD).No.18214 of 2020 regarding land encroachment.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition stood closed due to submission that respondents complied with the previous order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.996 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 17.08.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Cont.P.(MD)No.996 of 2021
R.Abuthagir ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.Senthi vel, Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk Office, Virudhunagar.
2.Mrs.R.Jegadeeshwari, Commissioner, Virudhunagar Municipality, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971, to punish the respondents for contempt of orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.18214 of 2020, dated 29.01.2021 by detaining the respondents in civil prison.
Prayer in WP(MD).18214/2020:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Abuthagir
- respondent
Mr. Senthivel, Tahsildar, Virudhunagar Taluk Office
- respondent
Mrs. R. Jegadeeshwari, Commissioner, Virudhunagar Municipality
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court