Disposed

Karuppasamy v. T.Anbalagan

Madras HC5 Jul 2021CONT P(MD)/712/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was filed to punish respondents for allegedly disobeying an order directing action on representations. The Court noted the initiation of proceedings under the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act and closed the petition without punishment.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition was closed without any punishment being imposed on the respondents.

Karuppasamy Vs T.Anbalagan — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD).No.712 of 2021

¶2

Karuppasamy Vs. The District Collector

¶3

cum Inspector of Panchayats, Madurai District and another

¶4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 05.07.2021 CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Cont.P.(MD).No.712 of 2021 in W.P.(MD).No.6817 of 2020

¶6

Karuppasamy

¶7

...Petitioner / Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

T.Anbalagan,

¶10

The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats, Madurai District.

¶11

Chelladurai, Assistant Director (Panchayath), Madurai District. ... Contemnors / Respondent

¶12

Nos.1 & 2

¶13

PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of order dated 18.06.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.6817 of 2020.

¶14

Prayer in WP(MD). 6817/ 2020 :

¶15

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the 1st Respondent to take appropriate action on the representation given by the petitioner dated 02-05-2020 and 11-05-2020 within the period that may be stipulated by this Honourable Court.

¶16

For Petitioner :Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents :Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, Government Advocate O R D E R

¶17

The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that based on the complaint given by the petitioner and based on the report received from the Committee, proceedings have been initiated under Section 205 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994, against the concerned President. The relevant proceedings are also produced before this Court.

¶18

The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents shall serve a copy of this same to the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

Cont.P.(MD).No.712 of 2021

¶21

Karuppasamy Vs. The District Collector

¶22

cum Inspector of Panchayats, Madurai District and another

¶23

counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶24

Recording the submissions of the learned Government Advocate, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CS-III)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

tsg

¶29

NOTE:

¶30

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶31

¶32

The District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats, Madurai District.

¶33

The Assistant Director (Panchayath), Madurai District.

¶34

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-21353[F] dated 06/07/2021 )

¶35

+1 CC to M/s.R.GANDHI, Advocate ( SR-21311[F] dated 06/07/2021 )

¶36

Order made in Cont.P.(MD).No.712 of 2021

¶37

Dated : 05.07.2021

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

2/2

Karuppasamy v. T.Anbalagan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karuppasamy v. T.Anbalagan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Senthilkumar.C Vs The Executive Officer

Tamilmani. S.R Vs The Govt. of Tamil Nadu

Singaram.v Vs the Dist Collector

M/S A.V. Thomas Nagar Welfare Vs the District Collector

Rajathi.S Vs Tamilnadu Housing Board

Jeyanthi, Vs the District Collector