Order in contempt petition regarding compliance of earlier writ order. Court closed the matter as order allegedly complied but allowed challenge to proceedings.
Closed contempt petition allowing petitioner to challenge compliance proceedings in manner known to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD) No.337 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.03.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.(MD) No.337 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.10635 of 2020
Xavier
... Petitioner/Petitioner
vs.
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors/respondents herein for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD).No.10635 of 2020 dated 16.09.2020.
Prayer in WP(MD)No.10635/2020 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to direct the Respondents to provide SLR Copy pertaining to Patta No.96, Survey No.72/6 and 116/10, situated at Karungalakudi Village, Survey No.101,407 situated at Uppur Village, Survey No.136,106,104,90/9,102 and 138/9 situated at Thelur Village, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, based on the Petitioner's representation dated 04.08.2020 and pass such further or other orders.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugan
For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh Special Government Pleader
1/2
Cont.P.(MD) No.337 of 2021
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.C.Ramesh, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents/contemnors would submit that the order passed in the writ petition dated 16.09.2020 has been complied with and in this regard, he has produced a copy of the proceedings of the District Collector concerned, dated 12.11.2020.
2.In view of the same, this Court does not think that this contempt petition can be kept pending anymore and accordingly, the same stands closed. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings of the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, dated 12.11.2020 in a manner known to law, if he is so advised.
Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS-III)
// True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-)
To
1.Pankaj Kumar Bansal, I.A.S., Commissioner of Land Administration, O/o.Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.
2.Dinesh Ponraj Oliver, I.A.S., District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.
+1 CC to SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER ( SR-11157[F] dated 15/03/2021 ) MM TE: 31/03/2021 : 2P/4C
Cont.P.(MD)No.337 of 2021 in W.P.(MD)No.10635 of 2020 12.03.2021
2/2
Xavier
Pankaj Kumar Bansal
Dinesh Ponraj Oliver
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
