L.Lawrence Maria Anthuvan v. S.Shanthi
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for disobedience of an order directing respondents to initiate action for pensionary benefits. Court found no contempt arose as benefits were sent/settled and closed the petition granting liberty to work out remedy.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; liberty granted to petitioner to work out remedy known to law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD).No.113 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Cont.P. (MD)No.113 of 2020 in
W.P.(MD).No.7890 of 2012 L.Lawrence Maria Anthuvan ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
1.Ms.S.Shanthi, Chief Educational Officer, Syed Murthusha Hr. Secondary School Compound, Palakarai, Trichy -8.
2.Mr.Bharathi Vivekanandam, District Educational Officer, District Educational Office, Collectorate, Trichy -1.
3.Mr.Chinnappan, Correspondent, R.C.Higher Secondary School, represented by on behalf of Bishop, The Roman Catholic Diocese of Tiruchirapalli Society, Cantonment,
Trichy District.
3rd respondent is impleaded in Sub.A.(MD).No.54 of 2020 in Cont.P. (MD).No.113 of 2020 vide Court order dated05.02.2021.
... Respondents
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent's failure to settle terminal benefits constitutes contempt of the previous order.
Whether liberty should be granted to the petitioner to work out remedies for the pending benefit settlement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L. Lawrence Maria Anthuvan
- respondent
S. Shanthi
- respondent
Bharathi Vivekanandam
- respondent
Chinnappan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court