Karuppan.C v. Ponmalar
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act was dropped, permitting the petitioner to challenge the rejected order dated 10.09.2018 regarding a patta application.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition dropped; petitioner permitted to challenge the order dated 10.09.2018.
What the court decided
Cont.P.(MD).No.1009 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.09.2021 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Cont.P.(MD).No.1009 of 2021 in W.P.(MD).No.8321 of 2021
C.Karuppan ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Ponmalar, The Tahsildar, Aalangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District. ... Contemnor/Respondent
PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the contemnor / respondent herein for willful and wanton disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in the above W.P.(MD).No.8321 of 2021 dated 22.04.2021 under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Prayer in WP(MD). 8321/ 2021:
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To Issue a writ or order more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus or order to direct the 2nd respondent to issue patta in the petitioner name in house property in survey No.225/3A2 total extend of 22 1/4 cent situated in Vallathrakkottai village, Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai district by considering the petitioner application/representation dated 24.03.2021 and may pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper to the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Karuppan
- respondent
Mr. Ponmalar, The Tahsildar, Aalangudi Taluk, Pudukkottai District
Coram
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court