S.Perumal v. M.Pattamuthu@Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition regarding non-implementation of a writ petition directing registration of deeds, the respondent produced proceedings showing compliance with the Court's direction, leading to the closure of the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.1000 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.01.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN Cont.P.(MD)No.1000 of 2020
in
W.P.(MD)No.6567 of 2020
S.Perumal ... Petitioner/Petitioner
vs.
M.Pattamuthu @ Ramesh The Sub Registrar, Nanguneri Sub Registrar Office, Nanguneri, Tirunelveli District ... Contemnor/Respondent No.2
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent for his deliberate and willful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P.(MD)No.6567 of 2020, dated 12.08.2020.
Prayer in WP(MD). 6567/ 2020 :
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent committed willful disobedience of the Court's order warranting contempt punishment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Perumal
- respondent
M. Pattamuthu @ Ramesh
Coram
V. Parthiban
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court